I couldn’t do this work without Wikipedia. If the government or some university take it over, it will cease in some measure to be free. Look what happened to CNN when Ted Turner was forced to sell it. For those of us who love truth and information, almost nothing could be more important than keeping this powerful tool out of the hands of special interests. Donate to Wikipedia today.
-
Recent Posts
- The Murder of Shakespeare’s Identity: Act IV
- The murder of Shakespeare’s identity: Acts I through III
- Theatrical birth pangs: 1776 to 1584
- “King of Shadows”
- Oxford’s three audiences
- The Scenario that works!
- Missing the fun factor
- Review: “The Shakespeare Guide to Italy”
- The authorship scenario in a nutshell
- Who’s afraid of the Big Bad Boar?
Categories
THE AUTHORSHIP QUESTION
- BLOG
- SHAKESPEARE WHO?
- The Authorship problem
- History of the Question
- The Top Six Candidates
- Why Shakespeare matters
- Expanding the Question
- Authorship timeline
- The Cover-up: who did it?
- Why it's taken so long
- Points to keep in mind
- BACKGROUND
- OXFORD
- SOURCES
- YOUR QUESTIONS
- Where Shakespeare is referred to as “Gent” or “Master,” who is meant? – Howard Schumann
- Why is not the Basse eulogy from the 1640 Folio evidence of Stratford authorship? – Howard Schumann
- If Harvey didn’t write the attacks on Greene, why didn’t he protest?- Chris Kaiser
- What are your sources for “Oxford & Bacon: Prospero & Ariel”?-Jerry Harner
- What’s the evidence for Edward arriving on Smith’s doorstep at age four? – Marie Merkel
- Was Don Quixote written by an English author (Bacon or possibly de Vere)? – Howard Schumann
- Was Oxford a misogynist? – Ronald Chisholm
- Who is it that the Dark Lady has bewitched in Sonnet 134? – Howard Schumann
- Do we have Oxford’s horoscope? – Breck Breckenridge
- Doesn’t the image of the Queen in V&A contradict your description of her as unwilling to give herself physically to a man? – Howard Schumann
- If Oxford didn’t die in 1604, why no reference in any play to scientific developments after 1604?- Fred Nergenah
- Why did the coverup continue past Oxford’s death? – Alex McNeil
- Was Oxford Don Ricardo Barbarossa in Nashe’s “Have With You”?-Rolymo
- What are the certain connections between Fisher’s Folly and the University Wits? – B.K. McDonald
- Where can I get details about de Vere’s life that may pinpoint the ways in which his papers were dispersed? – Stella Samaras
- Why were none of the plays de Vere wrote as Greene included in the First Folio? – Chris Kaiser
- What proof is there that Bacon was Spenser?-Howard Schumann
- Can you explain the “seventh signature”? – Brian McDonald
- Did Oxford leave books behind? – Charlie Kellogg
- Was William Shakespeare, the actor, the Earl of Oxford? – Howard Schumann
- Why did Oxford have to hide his identity behind real people?––Chris Kaiser
- Why was it dishonorable for peers to write?-Michael Egan
- Why couldn’t Oxford admit to writing Venus and Adonis?-Michael Egan
- How did Oxford connect with William?––Lynda Taylor
- Why the vast conspiracy of silence?––Michael Egan
- What connection did Shakespeare (Oxford?) have with Francis Langley?––Jumpypants
- What’s the background to Much Ado?––Jumpypants
- WHO AM I?
Blogroll
- Heward Wilkinson's Reflections Reflections on the Authorship Question from a philosophical point of view.
- Shakespeare by Another Name News and views on the AQ by Mark Anderson, author of the most recent biography of the Earl of Oxford.
- The Shakespeare Adventure News on Shakespeare in general and the AQ in particular.
- Hank Whittemore's Shakespeare blog Comments on the AQ from a PT perspective.
- 1609 Chronology Oxfordian scholar Robert Brazil provides interesting information on events that occured in 1609.
- Oberon News and views on the AQ from Oberon, the Ann Arbor Michigan Shakespeare group.
- The Oxfreudian: the psychology of the Authorship Question
- Marie Merkel's Edward Oxenford Review
Archives
