<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authorship timeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicworm.com/oxford-shakespeare/an-exceedingly-sparse-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicworm.com</link>
	<description>Shakespeare authorship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopkinshughes</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/oxford-shakespeare/an-exceedingly-sparse-record/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hopkinshughes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?page_id=1018#comment-634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no explanation for this.  Perhaps someday when the academics do the kind of archival research that we need, we&#039;ll have the answer.  Meanwhile, we&#039;ll have to put it aside along with &quot;our Roscius&quot; on the book turned up by Paul Altrocchi, the Northumberland mss, and a dozen other minor mysteries.  What we can do is continue to work with what we can be sure of.  Sooner or later we&#039;ll find a place for it, and if not, well, so be it.  What we can&#039;t do is to base some theory on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no explanation for this.  Perhaps someday when the academics do the kind of archival research that we need, we&#8217;ll have the answer.  Meanwhile, we&#8217;ll have to put it aside along with &#8220;our Roscius&#8221; on the book turned up by Paul Altrocchi, the Northumberland mss, and a dozen other minor mysteries.  What we can do is continue to work with what we can be sure of.  Sooner or later we&#8217;ll find a place for it, and if not, well, so be it.  What we can&#8217;t do is to base some theory on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotoguzzi</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/oxford-shakespeare/an-exceedingly-sparse-record/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fotoguzzi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?page_id=1018#comment-630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a plausible explanation for Shaksper to have owned a copy of Archaionomia?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a plausible explanation for Shaksper to have owned a copy of Archaionomia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

