<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>politicworm &#187; Earl of Oxford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicworm.com/category/earl-of-oxford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicworm.com</link>
	<description>Shakespeare authorship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='politicworm.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://politicworm.com/osd.xml" title="politicworm" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://politicworm.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Missing the fun factor</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2012/01/27/missing-the-fun-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2012/01/27/missing-the-fun-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward de Vere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William of Stratford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare cover-up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.wordpress.com/?p=5089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Punning is a harmless addiction, however annoying.  Puns are fun if the conversation is light-hearted, but infuriating if it’s serious, where they come off as a kind of verbal sabotage.  Habitual punners seem unable ever to let a serious conversation &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2012/01/27/missing-the-fun-factor/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=5089&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2012/01/27/missing-the-fun-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The authorship scenario in a nutshell</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/11/27/the-authorship-scenario-in-a-nutshell/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/11/27/the-authorship-scenario-in-a-nutshell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Jonson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Marlowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward de Vere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis Bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Sidney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political repression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William of Stratford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nashe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Sidney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=4571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who may be new to the authorship question or who haven&#8217;t been able to piece together a full scenario from the hodge podge of my necessarily brief posts and pages, here’s a quick overview (well, as quick as &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/11/27/the-authorship-scenario-in-a-nutshell/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=4571&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/11/27/the-authorship-scenario-in-a-nutshell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s afraid of the Big Bad Boar?</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/11/12/whos-afraid-of-the-big-bad-oxford/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/11/12/whos-afraid-of-the-big-bad-oxford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward de Vere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxfordian theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the London Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=4610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the major problems in getting the world to take Oxford seriously as Shakespeare is his bad reputation with historians.  Sure it came from his enemies, Henry Howard and Robert Cecil, who, no matter how notorious they were themselves, &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/11/12/whos-afraid-of-the-big-bad-oxford/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=4610&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/11/12/whos-afraid-of-the-big-bad-oxford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was John Shakspere a dissident nonconformist?</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/07/21/was-john-shakspere-a-dissident-nonconformist/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/07/21/was-john-shakspere-a-dissident-nonconformist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward de Vere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxfordian theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political repression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare's religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir Thomas Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Reformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church of England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare&#039;s sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=4237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a book titled Shakespeare, Puritan and Recusant, published in 1897, author Thomas Carter makes a convincing argument that the apparent troubles brought on the Shakspere family beginning around 1576 were due neither to Catholicism nor debt, but to John &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/07/21/was-john-shakspere-a-dissident-nonconformist/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=4237&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/07/21/was-john-shakspere-a-dissident-nonconformist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The origins of Hamlet</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/05/23/the-origins-of-hamlet/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/05/23/the-origins-of-hamlet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Modern literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward de Vere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabethan era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literary Renaissance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamlet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare&#039;s sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Spanish Tragedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=4148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By 1559, the dawn of the Elizabethan era, nine-year-old Edward de Vere had probably already absorbed much of the philosophy of the English Reformation from one who had helped to create it, his tutor, Sir Thomas Smith.  He would have &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/05/23/the-origins-of-hamlet/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=4148&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/05/23/the-origins-of-hamlet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymity through the ages</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/04/29/anonymity-through-the-ages/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/04/29/anonymity-through-the-ages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabethan era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literary Renaissance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis Bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxfordian theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political repression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the London Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Reformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Marlowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward de Vere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Sidney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nashe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Greene]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=4118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This “elaborate charade” It looks like certain elements of the academy may be beginning to pay attention to the authorship question.  John Mullan’s Anonymity: A Secret History of Literature is one hopeful sign (Faber and Faber, 2007).  If he doesn&#8217;t &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/04/29/anonymity-through-the-ages/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=4118&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/04/29/anonymity-through-the-ages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beautified is a vile phrase</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/04/06/beautified-is-a-vile-phrase/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/04/06/beautified-is-a-vile-phrase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamlet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxfordian theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare&#039;s education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare&#039;s sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=3537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the argument about his identity, the one thing that no one denies is that Shakespeare was an artist, one of the greatest that ever lived.  Yet what does that mean to most people?  Far too often in discussions &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/04/06/beautified-is-a-vile-phrase/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=3537&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/04/06/beautified-is-a-vile-phrase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Peter Moore&#8217;s Lame Storyteller</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/03/20/review-peter-moores-lame-storyteller/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/03/20/review-peter-moores-lame-storyteller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Jonson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Modern literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward de Vere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabethan era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literary Renaissance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxfordian theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare&#039;s education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare&#039;s Sonnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir Thomas Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William of Stratford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Moore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=4037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year the world of Oxfordian scholarship benefits by the publication of books by two of its most important scholars, Peter Moore and Richard Roe, both gone whence no traveller returns.  Roe&#8217;s long awaited Shakespeare’s Guide to Italy will be &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/03/20/review-peter-moores-lame-storyteller/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=4037&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/03/20/review-peter-moores-lame-storyteller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When did The Question first arise?</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/02/21/when-did-the-question-first-arise/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/02/21/when-did-the-question-first-arise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxfordian theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the London Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=3910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watching Book-TV on CSPAN the other night I caught the end of a lecture by Elaine Showalter, author of the recently published The Vintage Book of American Women Writers and professor emerita of English at Princeton University, on the challenges to &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/02/21/when-did-the-question-first-arise/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=3910&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/02/21/when-did-the-question-first-arise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oxford and the Media</title>
		<link>http://politicworm.com/2011/02/16/oxford-and-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://politicworm.com/2011/02/16/oxford-and-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hopkinshughes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authorship Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl of Oxford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Modern literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the London Stage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theater history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Marlowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicworm.com/?p=3886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s always enlightening to examine the conditions that made possible great and lasting enterprises like democracy, the Olympic games, or the internet.  Today the so-called Fourth Estate of government, aka the Media, a vast enterprise encompassing many areas in both &#8230; <a href="http://politicworm.com/2011/02/16/oxford-and-the-media/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=politicworm.com&amp;blog=5173207&amp;post=3886&amp;subd=politicworm&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicworm.com/2011/02/16/oxford-and-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/48071764bcdd85f924a21d42b6f547b9?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">hopkinshughes</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
